Which Broker Has Lower Fees and Spreads?

Both brokers match on core forex spreads at 0.6 pips for EUR/USD. The differences emerge in secondary costs. IG charges a £12 monthly inactivity fee after 24 months of no trades. Capital.com charges nothing for inactivity. Share CFD commission also differs: IG charges from £3 per trade whilst Capital.com uses spread-only pricing.

Cost Type IG Capital.com Winner
EUR/USD SpreadFrom 0.6 pipsFrom 0.6 pipsTie
GBP/USD SpreadFrom 0.9 pips1.3 pipsIG
UK 100 Spread1 point1 pointTie
Share CFD CommissionFrom £3/tradeSpread onlyCapital.com
FX Conversion0.5%0.7%IG
Overnight FundingVaries by instrument4% + benchmarkIG
Inactivity Fee£12/month after 24 monthsNoneCapital.com
Withdrawal FeeNoneNoneTie

My personal experience with IG's costs

Trading GBP/USD during London sessions, I paid roughly 0.9 pip spreads consistently. The share CFD commission adds up for frequent traders. I appreciated the lack of deposit fees but got caught with the inactivity charge when I took a break.

My personal experience with Capital.com's costs

The spread-only model made cost calculation simpler. Forex spreads matched IG on majors. The 0.7% FX conversion fee bit into profits when trading USD-denominated instruments from my GBP account. No surprise inactivity fees after my three-month hiatus.

Side-by-side comparison showing IG with 17,000+ markets and £250 minimum deposit versus Capital.com with 5,000+ markets and £20 minimum deposit
Here's where scale meets accessibility — IG wins on sheer market range, but Capital.com lowers the barrier to entry dramatically.

Which Platform Is Easier to Use?

Capital.com wins for modern interface design and TradingView integration. IG wins for platform variety and depth of features. Both mobile apps performed reliably during my testing. Execution speed was comparable at under 0.05 seconds for both.

My personal experience with IG's platform

IG's web platform feels comprehensive but overwhelming initially. ProRealTime charting is excellent for technical analysis. The mobile app mirrors web functionality well. I needed two weeks to feel comfortable navigating all features.

ProRealTime trading platform displayed on a desktop monitor with advanced charting tools and order management features
For technical traders, this is where IG really stands out — ProRealTime adds a professional-grade feel to the experience.

My personal experience with Capital.com's platform

Capital.com's interface is cleaner and more intuitive. The native TradingView integration means I can trade directly from charts I already know. Their 0.014-second average execution speed impressed during volatile sessions. Setup took one afternoon.

Desktop trading platform showing a watchlist of US stocks and a candlestick price chart for Ford Motor Co
The interface feels clean and modern — especially for traders who want straightforward execution without clutter.

Which Broker Has Better TradingView Integration?

Capital.com wins decisively. Capital.com offers native TradingView integration, allowing you to trade directly from TradingView's charts with full indicator access. IG does not support TradingView. IG offers ProRealTime as an alternative, which is powerful but requires a separate learning curve. For technical traders already using TradingView, Capital.com is the obvious choice.

Which Broker Is Safer for UK Traders?

Both brokers maintain top-tier safety standards. IG edges ahead due to 50+ years of operation and public listing on the London Stock Exchange. Capital.com is multi-regulated across FCA, CySEC, ASIC, SCB, and SCA jurisdictions. Both offer FSCS protection up to £85,000 and segregated client accounts.

Safety Feature IG Capital.com Winner
FCA RegulatedYes (FRN: 195355)Yes (FRN: 793714)Tie
FSCS ProtectionUp to £85,000Up to £85,000Tie
Segregated AccountsYesYesTie
Negative Balance ProtectionYesYesTie
Years Operating50+ years8+ yearsIG
Publicly ListedYes (LSE: IGG)NoIG

Learn more about Capital.com’s safety credentials or read my in-depth look at whether IG is safe for UK traders.

Which Broker Is Better for Beginners?

Capital.com wins for beginners. The £20 minimum deposit lowers the barrier to entry significantly compared to IG’s suggested £250. Capital.com’s Investmate app provides bite-sized lessons under three minutes. The platform’s cleaner interface creates a gentler learning curve. IG’s Academy offers excellent content but the platform complexity can overwhelm newcomers — I cover this in more detail in my guide on whether IG suits beginners.

Smartphone screen showing the Capital.com app with educational videos, market analysis, and trading content sections
I actually like how Capital.com integrates education directly into the app — it makes learning feel less separate from trading.

Which Broker Is Better for Day Trading?

IG wins for day trading breadth. Access to 17,000+ instruments means more opportunities across sessions. ProRealTime's advanced charting suits technical strategies. Capital.com's 0.014-second execution speed matches IG's performance. For pure forex day trading, both perform equally. For multi-asset day trading, IG's range wins. See my detailed analysis of Capital.com for day trading and how IG performs for day traders.

IG mobile app screen showing expert market analysis articles and recent financial news headlines
IG's research feed feels more traditional brokerage-style — useful if you like having analyst commentary at your fingertips.

Which Broker Is Better for Spread Betting?

Both brokers deliver strong spread betting platforms. IG offers 4,700+ spread betting markets whilst Capital.com provides 4,700+ markets. Both platforms allow tax-free trading where profits are exempt from capital gains tax and stamp duty. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances. IG’s longer track record in spread betting gives slight edge for this specific product. For a closer look, see my review of IG’s spread betting service.

Which Broker Is Better for Investing?

IG wins for long-term investing. IG offers ISA and SIPP accounts that Capital.com lacks entirely. These tax wrappers let you shelter gains from capital gains tax. IG's share dealing service provides access to 12,000+ stocks on major exchanges. Capital.com focuses purely on CFD and spread betting products with no share ownership. For buy-and-hold investors wanting actual stock ownership, IG is the only viable choice.

IG dashboard displaying spread betting, CFD, share dealing accounts, portfolio balances, and live market prices
IG's dashboard feels more institutional — there's a lot going on, but it reflects the platform's broader capabilities.

What Can You Trade on Each Platform?

IG wins comprehensively on market range. The 17,000+ instruments dwarf Capital.com's 5,000+. IG offers options and futures that Capital.com lacks entirely. Capital.com counters with 130+ forex pairs versus IG's 80+. For cryptocurrency access, IG now offers direct crypto trading through its partnership with Uphold, while Capital.com restricts crypto to professional clients in the UK.

Asset Class IG Capital.com Winner
Forex Pairs80+130+Capital.com
Share CFDs16,000+4,000+IG
Indices80+20+IG
Commodities35+25+IG
Crypto (UK Retail)Via UpholdPro clients onlyIG
ETFsYesYesTie
OptionsYesNoIG
FuturesYesNoIG

What Are the Pros and Cons of Each Broker?

Pros and Cons of Using IG

Pros
  • 17,000+ instruments including options and futures that Capital.com lacks entirely
  • 50-year track record with public listing on the London Stock Exchange
  • ISA and SIPP accounts available for tax-efficient long-term investing
  • Tighter GBP/USD spreads at 0.9 pips versus Capital.com’s 1.3 pips
Cons
  • £12 monthly inactivity fee after 24 months catches traders who take breaks
  • No native TradingView integration — must use ProRealTime or MT4 instead
  • Platform complexity can feel overwhelming for newer traders
  • Suggested £250 minimum deposit is higher than Capital.com’s £20

Pros and Cons of Using Capital.com

Pros
  • Native TradingView integration for chart-based trading without platform switching
  • No inactivity fees regardless of how long your account sits dormant
  • £20 minimum deposit lowers the barrier to entry for new traders
  • 0.014-second average execution speed delivers reliable fills in volatile sessions
Cons
  • Younger company at 8 years versus IG’s 50+ year track record
  • No ISA or SIPP accounts for tax-efficient long-term investing
  • Crypto restricted to professional UK clients only
  • Smaller market range at 5,000+ versus IG’s 17,000+ instruments

Compare Capital.com against other platforms: Capital.com vs Trading 212 and XTB vs Capital.com.

Comparison chart showing Capital.com offering spread betting and CFDs, while IG offers spread betting, CFDs, options, futures, stocks and shares ISA, and SIPP accounts
This visual really highlights the core difference — Capital.com feels built for active traders, while IG stretches further into long-term investing and tax-efficient accounts.

Full Feature Comparison Table

Here's the complete side-by-side breakdown across every key metric.

Feature IG Capital.com Winner
RegulationFCA, ASIC, multipleFCA, CySEC, ASIC, SCB, SCATie
Years Operating50+8+IG
Min Deposit£250 suggested£20Capital.com
EUR/USD SpreadFrom 0.6 pipsFrom 0.6 pipsTie
Platform Choice4 options3 optionsIG
TradingViewNoYesCapital.com
Spread BettingYesYesTie
ISA/SIPPYesNoIG
EducationExcellentExcellentTie
Inactivity Fee£12/month (24mo)NoneCapital.com
Market Range17,000+5,000+IG
Trustpilot Rating4.2/54.6/5Capital.com

Final Verdict – Which Broker Should You Choose?

IG wins for experienced traders wanting maximum market access, options trading, or tax-wrapper accounts. Capital.com wins for cost-conscious traders, TradingView users, and beginners starting with smaller deposits. Neither is objectively better — the right choice depends entirely on your trading priorities.

If you want… Choose
Maximum market rangeIG
TradingView integrationCapital.com
ISA or SIPPIG
Lower minimum depositCapital.com
No inactivity feesCapital.com
Options/futures tradingIG
Tax-free spread bettingEither
Best mobile app designCapital.com
Longest track recordIG

FAQs

Is IG or Capital.com cheaper for forex trading?

They match on major pairs with EUR/USD from 0.6 pips on both platforms. Capital.com wins overall due to no inactivity fees and spread-only pricing on share CFDs.

Which broker has better customer support?

Capital.com scores higher with 24/7 English support and 5-minute average chat response. IG support quality varies by contact method and time of day.

Can I use TradingView with IG or Capital.com?

Only Capital.com offers native TradingView integration. IG does not support TradingView but offers ProRealTime as an advanced charting alternative.

Which broker is better for UK beginners?

Capital.com suits beginners better with its £20 minimum deposit, simpler interface, and Investmate educational app delivering lessons under three minutes.

Are both brokers regulated by the FCA?

Yes. IG holds FCA registration FRN 195355. Capital.com holds FCA registration FRN 793714. Both provide FSCS protection up to £85,000.

Which broker has lower spreads?

Spreads match on major forex pairs at 0.6 pips for EUR/USD. IG offers tighter GBP/USD spreads at 0.9 pips versus Capital.com’s 1.3 pips.

Does IG offer an ISA while Capital.com doesn’t?

Yes. IG offers a Stocks and Shares ISA and a SIPP for tax-efficient long-term investing. Capital.com does not offer any ISA or pension products — it focuses purely on CFD and spread betting accounts.

Which broker offers more markets?

IG offers over 17,000 instruments including options and futures. Capital.com offers around 5,000 instruments focused on CFDs and spread bets. For sheer market breadth, IG is significantly ahead.

Can UK retail traders access crypto on both platforms?

IG offers direct crypto trading for UK retail clients through its partnership with Uphold. Capital.com restricts crypto access to professional clients only in the UK, so retail traders cannot trade crypto on Capital.com.

Which platform has a lower minimum deposit?

Capital.com requires just £20 to get started. IG has no formal minimum but suggests £250 as a starting balance. Capital.com is clearly more accessible for traders starting with smaller amounts.

References