Which platform should your automation run on?

Pepperstone supports automation on three of its platforms, and the right one is decided by what your strategy is written in, not by preference.

MT4 and MT5: where the EA world lives

If your strategy is an Expert Advisor, it was almost certainly written for MetaTrader, and Pepperstone runs EAs on both MT4 and MT5 without restriction. MT4 remains the compatibility king for the enormous back catalogue of MQL4 EAs; MT5 backtests dramatically faster, handles more markets and order types, and is where I would build anything new in the MetaTrader world.

Smart Trader Tools: the automation you do not have to write

Pepperstone bundles Smart Trader Tools, a set of 28 add-ons, expert advisors and indicators exclusive to its MetaTrader platforms: trade management, alarm and session tools that cover a surprising amount of what people commission custom EAs to do. Before paying a developer for a break-even-and-trail manager, check whether the bundled toolkit already does it.

Pepperstone MT4 platform showing multiple forex charts, an order ticket and the Navigator panel where Expert Advisors are managed
MT4 on Pepperstone: dated to look at, but still the platform the world's EA library was written for.

cTrader: automation in C#

cTrader Automate lets you build, backtest and optimise cBots in C# against the cTrader API. If you are writing a strategy from scratch and would rather work in a modern language with a proper IDE workflow than in MQL, it is the more pleasant home, and it lives on the platform with the best manual-execution tools if you like to supervise your bot with a human hand on the wheel.

API and FIX: the heavy end

For custom setups beyond the retail platforms, Pepperstone offers API trading on request, subject to eligibility, and a FIX API route for which demo access requires EUR 160 million per month in trading volume. That last number tells you exactly who it is for; most readers of this page want the VPS section below instead.

Pepperstone cTrader with charts, watchlist and order ticket, the platform hosting cBots via cTrader Automate
cTrader Automate runs C# cBots against the cTrader API: the modern route for strategies built from scratch.

How does the free VPS actually work?

An EA is only as reliable as the machine it runs on, and a home PC that sleeps, updates or drops Wi-Fi is the classic way automated strategies die at 3am. Pepperstone's answer is a sponsored VPS: a hosted virtual machine, free while you trade enough to earn it.

The three tiers and what they demand

Each plan is earned with notional volume over the previous 60 days, requires at least one trade in the last month to count as an active trader, and renews monthly while the volume holds.

Pepperstone sponsored VPS tiers, as published July 2026. Volume is 60-day notional; approximate lot figures are Pepperstone's own guide.
Plan 60-day volume to qualify Spec
CoreUSD 1,000,000 (~10 FX lots)2 vCPU, 4GB RAM, 100GB SSD
PlusUSD 1,500,000 (~15 FX lots)4 vCPU, 6GB RAM, 150GB SSD
ProUSD 2,000,000 (~20 FX lots)6 vCPU, 8GB RAM, 200GB SSD

Is the entry bar realistic?

Ten standard lots across 60 days is one lot a week, give or take, which most people running an EA seriously will clear without noticing; it is a modest bar for what amounts to free 24/7 hosting. The Core spec, two virtual cores and 4GB of RAM, comfortably runs a MetaTrader instance with a handful of EAs; the higher tiers matter if you run multiple platform instances or indicator-heavy setups.

The catch to plan around

If your volume dips, the sponsorship lapses at renewal, so a strategy that trades rarely by design may need paid hosting elsewhere rather than an entitlement that comes and goes underneath it. Treat the volume requirement as a monthly subscription paid in lots.

If your system's natural pace is five lots a month, the free VPS is not really free for you.

What about latency?

Pepperstone offers the VPS across 22 data centre locations worldwide and quotes platform execution latency as low as 1 millisecond from hosted environments, with its servers executing incoming orders at around a 30ms average. Treat the 1ms as the best case it is, but the practical point stands: an EA hosted next to the broker's infrastructure round-trips orders in the time a home connection spends thinking about it. For strategies that trade the opening seconds of a move, that is the difference between the backtest and the live results agreeing; for a slow swing EA, it is a convenience rather than an edge.

Pepperstone MT5 platform showing the market watch, a price chart and the algorithmic trading toolbar
MT5 on Pepperstone: faster backtesting than MT4 and the platform I would point new EA builders toward.

Does the execution hold up for automated strategies?

Automation concentrates your execution risk: an EA will happily fire a thousand orders into conditions a human would sit out, so the venue's plumbing matters even more once a robot is trading.

The plumbing an EA actually cares about

There is no dealing desk between the order and the market. Hedging is allowed, with margin charged on the larger leg, which matters for grid and pairs-style systems. The raw-spread Razor account gives an EA the near-zero spreads its logic was probably tested against, and my own Q1 testing recorded a 47ms median fill with roughly 78% of orders slipping nothing at all, numbers boring enough to build a bot on. With a £10 minimum deposit, running a new EA on a tiny live account before scaling it, the single best habit in automated trading, costs almost nothing here.

The costs backtests forget

The costs an EA pays are the same ones I itemise in my EUR/USD cost log: commission on every round turn (£4.50 per lot on a GBP MetaTrader account) and swaps on anything held overnight, which on a long EUR/USD position ran about £7.10 a night in my log. A strategy that trades forty times a month and holds through rollovers pays real money in both lines, so both belong in the backtest before they turn up on the live statement.

The verdict: a proper home for automation?

Yes. Unrestricted EAs on MetaTrader with 28 bundled tools, a modern C# path on cTrader, an API lane for the genuinely big, execution fast and complete enough to trust a robot with, and a free VPS across 22 locations whose entry bar most active EA traders will clear in passing. The requirements are stated plainly: keep trading or lose the sponsorship, and bring a strategy that survives real costs. Pepperstone supplies the infrastructure; the edge remains your problem.

For which platform to build on, my platform comparison covers the trade-offs, and the raw pricing an EA trades against is in my Pepperstone forex review.

FAQs

Is Pepperstone's VPS really free?

Yes, while you qualify. The Core plan needs USD 1,000,000 of notional volume over the trailing 60 days, roughly 10 FX lots, plus at least one trade in the last month; it renews monthly while the volume holds. Higher tiers at 1.5m and 2m notional buy more vCPU, RAM and storage.

Does Pepperstone restrict EAs or trading styles?

No restrictions on Expert Advisors on MT4 or MT5, cBots run via cTrader Automate, and hedging is allowed with margin charged on the larger leg. Orders execute with no dealing desk intervention at an average of around 30 milliseconds, with 99.87% of received orders executed.

Should I build my strategy on MT4, MT5 or cTrader?

Run existing MQL4 EAs on MT4; build new MetaTrader strategies on MT5 for its faster tester and broader markets; choose cTrader Automate if you would rather write C# with a modern toolchain. The strategy's language decides the platform, not the other way round, and Smart Trader Tools may already cover simple trade-management jobs on MetaTrader.

Do I need a VPS to run an EA?

Strictly no, practically yes for anything that trades around the clock. A home setup fails in boring ways: sleep settings, updates, dropped connections. A VPS keeps the platform running next to the broker's infrastructure, and that proximity is how Pepperstone can quote hosted latency as low as 1ms against the tens of milliseconds a home line adds.

Does Pepperstone offer an API for custom systems?

Yes, on request and subject to eligibility, with a FIX API route whose demo access requires EUR 160 million per month in volume. For most retail algo traders, EAs or cBots on the standard platforms, hosted on the free VPS, are the practical setup.

References

  1. FCA Register: Pepperstone Ltd. FRN: 684312
  2. Pepperstone: sponsored VPS tiers and requirements
  3. Pepperstone: algorithmic trading (EAs and cTrader Automate)
  4. Pepperstone: API and FIX access