Profile
Co-Founder
Thomas brings extensive experience in financial analysis and investment research. With a strong background in both institutional and retail investment sectors, Thomas ensures all content meets the highest standards of accuracy and relevance.
Follow on Twitter Connect on LinkedIn"Every piece of investment advice should be grounded in solid research and practical application. My role is to ensure our content provides real value to investors at every level."
My Favourite Writes:
Profile
Co-Founder
Dom is an experienced retail investor, learning his craft in what he likes to call the "hard way". Through many of these lessons he has crafted himself a sound investment strategy that has enabled him to make investing into a business not just a hobby.
Follow on Twitter"Financial clarity and integrity are the cornerstones of everything we do. We're here to ensure that your investment journey is built on a solid financial understanding and a sound strategic foundation."
My Favourite Writes:
Profile
Co-founder & Senior Financial Platform Analyst
Adam founded The Investors Centre in 2023 and has personally tested 50+ UK financial platforms. An active investor since 2013, he has authored 200+ platform guides and oversees all testing methodology.
Follow on Twitter Connect on LinkedIn"Investment is about more than just numbers; it's about strategy, research, and the willingness to adapt."
My Favourite Writes:
How We Test
Our Commitment to Accuracy
At The Investors Centre, we maintain the highest standards of accuracy and reliability in all our investment education content. Every article undergoes rigorous fact-checking and review processes.
Our Testing & Verification Process
- Primary Research: We gather data directly from official sources including company reports, regulatory filings, and government databases.
- Platform Testing: Our team personally tests and evaluates investment platforms, creating accounts and documenting real user experiences.
- Expert Analysis: Content is reviewed by experienced investors and financial professionals within our team.
- Data Verification: All statistics, figures, and claims are cross-referenced with multiple authoritative sources.
- Regular Updates: We review and update content quarterly to ensure information remains current and accurate.
Review Standards
- Independence: We maintain editorial independence and disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
- Transparency: Our testing methodology and evaluation criteria are clearly documented.
- Objectivity: Reviews are based on measurable criteria and standardized testing procedures.
Corrections Policy
If errors are identified, we correct them promptly and note significant updates at the bottom of articles. Readers can report inaccuracies to our editorial team at info@theinvestorscentre.co.uk
Last Review Date
This article was last fact-checked and updated on: November 28, 2025
Disclaimer
Educational Purpose Only
All content on The Investors Centre is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It should not be construed as personalised investment advice, financial advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any investment or security.
No Financial Advice
We are not authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to provide investment advice. Content on this website does not constitute financial advice, and you should not rely on it as such. Always consult with a qualified financial advisor or professional before making investment decisions.
Investment Risks
Investing carries inherent risks, including the potential loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and you may not get back the amount originally invested.
Accuracy & Completeness
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of the information contained on this website.
Third-Party Content & Links
This website may contain links to third-party websites and references to third-party products or services. We do not endorse, control, or assume responsibility for any third-party content, privacy policies, or practices. Users access third-party sites at their own risk.
Affiliate Disclosure
Some links on this site may be affiliate links. If you click on these links and make a purchase or sign up for a service, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. This does not influence our editorial content or reviews.
Personal Responsibility
Any action you take upon the information on this website is strictly at your own risk. We will not be liable for any losses or damages in connection with the use of our website or the information provided.
Regulatory Notice
Investment products and services featured on this website may not be available in all jurisdictions or to all persons. Users are responsible for complying with local laws and regulations.
Contact Information
For questions about this disclaimer or our content, please contact:
Email: info@theinvestorscentre.co.uk
Last Updated
This disclaimer was last updated on: August 2025
Capital.com and Trading 212 are two of the most popular brokers for retail traders in Europe and the UK. Capital.com specialises in CFD and spread betting, while Trading 212 combines CFDs with zero-commission stock and ETF investing. The better choice depends on how you trade.
Quick Answer: Should You Choose Capital.com or Trading 212?
Capital.com is usually the better choice for active CFD traders who want education, TradingView support, clear costs, and fast withdrawals. Trading 212 suits long-term investors who primarily want commission-free stock or ETF investing with occasional CFD trading inside one app.
Capital.com vs Trading 212 Snapshot Comparison
| Metric | Capitalcom | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2016 | 2004 |
| Business model | CFDs and spread betting only | CFD plus Invest and ISA stock accounts |
| Minimum deposit | From 20 base currency | No official minimum |
| Trading commissions | 0 percent | 0 percent |
| FX conversion fee | 0.7 percent CFD | 0.5 percent CFD and 0.15 percent Invest |
| Platforms | Web Mobile TradingView MT4 | Web Mobile proprietary only |
| Trustpilot score | About 4.0 from 13000 plus reviews | About 4.6 from over 70000 reviews |
| Reported growth | 800000 new funded accounts in one quarter | Over 5 million lifetime funded accounts |
Table showing key differences between Capital.com and Trading 212 including pricing models, platform approach, account types, and public review volume.
Who Is Capital.com Best For vs Who Is Trading 212 Best For?
Choose Capital.com if you are primarily a CFD day trader who wants structured education, TradingView charts, and simple spread-only pricing. Choose Trading 212 if you want one app for long-term investing, ISA stock accounts, and occasional CFD trading without leaving the same interface.
For a complete breakdown, see our Capital.com review.
Platform Safety and Regulation Compared
Which Broker Has Stronger Regulatory Coverage?
Both brokers hold major licences including FCA authorisation. Capital.com and Trading 212 must segregate client funds and display risk warnings. Trading 212 is older, but Capital.com publishes detailed fee and execution breakdowns, supporting transparency for active traders.
Are Client Funds Protected the Same Way at Both Brokers?
Both brokers use segregated accounts under regulatory rules. Eligible clients benefit from negative balance protection. Trading 212 applies this across CFD accounts, while Capital.com extends protection across its CFD and spread bet offering depending on jurisdiction.
Fees, Spreads, and Trading Costs Compared
Capital.com uses a spread only cost model with no ticket commission on CFDs and spread bets. Trading 212 also offers commission-free CFD trading, but applies a 0.5% FX fee when instruments differ from account currency. In selected regions, Capital.com applies a 0.7% FX conversion but only on the cash adjustment, not the full trade value.
Overnight funding differs. Capital.com applies a published annual four percent fee divided daily plus benchmark rates. Trading 212 applies overnight interest that may be positive or negative depending on direction and instrument.
Does Capital.com or Trading 212 Have Lower CFD Costs?
For purely intraday CFD trading, Capital.com often works out cheaper due to the way its FX fee applies only to adjusted cash flows. Trading 212 can be cheaper for occasional trades, but frequent multi-currency CFD activity may produce accumulated FX conversion costs.
What About Stock and ETF Investing Costs?
Trading 212 offers zero-commission stock and ETF investing through Invest and ISA accounts, with only a 0.15% FX fee. Capital.com does not offer physical share ownership, focusing mostly on leveraged trading.
Are There Hidden FX Conversion or Funding Fees?
Both brokers disclose FX and overnight costs publicly. Capital.com applies 0.7% FX on relevant conversions and clearly shows overnight funding rates. Trading 212 applies 0.5% FX for CFD accounts and 0.15 percent for Invest accounts.
Full Cost Comparison
| Cost type | Capitalcom | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| CFD commission | 0 percent | 0 percent |
| FX fee CFD | 0.7 percent | 0.5 percent |
| FX fee Invest | Not applicable | 0.15 percent |
| Overnight funding | Broker fee 4 percent per year plus benchmark | Swap interest positive or negative |
| Guaranteed stop fee | Only if triggered | Not offered as separate feature |
| Stock ownership | No | Yes Invest and ISA |
Side-by-side cost comparison showing how each broker charges for FX, funding, and stock investing.
Platform and Execution Quality Compared
Which Platform Is Better for Active Traders?
Capital.com offers advanced charts, one-click trading, TradingView integration, and optional MT4. Trading 212 keeps everything inside its proprietary platform.
Can You Use MT4 or TradingView on Either Broker?
Capital.com supports TradingView and MT4 access in supported jurisdictions. Trading 212 does not support TradingView, MT4, or MT5.
Which Broker Has Faster Order Execution?
Both brokers report fast execution, but Capital.com highlights that over 99 percent of withdrawals were processed within 24 hours.
Markets and Instruments Compared
Which Broker Offers More Tradeable Assets?
Capital.com offers thousands of CFDs and spread bets (spread bets only available for UK clients). Trading 212 offers CFDs plus real stocks and ETFs.
Can Both Platforms Trade Crypto, Stocks, and Indices?
Both offer index CFDs. Capital.com offers cryptocurrency CFDs, but only for professional clients in the UK.
Education, Tools, and Extra Features
Which Broker Supports Beginners Better?
Capital.com offers structured learning courses, a learning app, a demo account, and behavioural alerts. Trading 212 offers basic explainers and community forums.
Deposit Minimums and Funding Options Compared
Which Broker Is Cheaper to Start With?
Capital.com allows deposits from 20 base currency units. Trading 212 has no formal minimum.
Whose Deposit and Withdrawal System Is Faster?
Both support instant card funding. Capital.com reports almost all withdrawals processed within 24 hours.
Pros and Cons Side-by-Side
Capital.com Pros and Cons
- Spread-only CFD pricing with 0 commission (other fees apply)
- TradingView and MT4 support
- Behavioural training and structured education
- Fast withdrawals and 24/7 customer support in selected regions
- No real share ownership
- FX conversion higher than Trading 212 Invest accounts
- Not a single-app solution for long-term investing
Trading 212 Pros and Cons
- Zero commission real stock and ETF investing
- ISA accounts with no custody fee
- Large Trustpilot footprint
- One app for investing and CFD trading
- No TradingView or MT4 support
- CFD FX conversion can accumulate
- Limited education tools
Full Feature Comparison Table
| Feature | Capital.com | Trading 212 |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | CFDs and spread betting only | CFD plus real stock and ETF investing |
| Platform support | Web, Mobile, TradingView, MT4 | Proprietary only |
| CFD costs | Spread-only, no ticket cost | Spread-only, no ticket cost |
| Investing costs | Not provided | Zero commission plus 0.15% FX |
| FX conversion | 0.7% on cash adjustments | 0.5% CFD / 0.15% Invest |
| Education | Built-in courses, learning app, behavioural alerts | Basic help docs, community discussions |
| Best for | Retail CFD day traders | CFD plus long-term investor hybrids |
Table summarising differences in platform support, cost models, education tools, and target trader type.
Final Verdict – Which Broker Should You Choose?
If you want a single app to buy stocks and ETFs, Trading 212 is a strong choice. Capital.com is the stronger choice for anyone prioritising CFD trading performance.
Trade Smarter with AI
Trade on 3,000+ Markets
- ✓ Tight Spreads & No Hidden Fees
- ✓ Advanced AI Analysis Tools
- ✓ Award-Winning Mobile App
Spread bets and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. 60% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading spread bets and CFDs with this provider. You should consider whether you understand how spread bets and CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
FAQs
Is Trading 212 Cheaper Than Capital.com?
Trading 212 is cheaper for long-term investing. Capital.com is often more cost-efficient for frequent CFD traders.
Which Broker Has Better Spreads?
Both offer zero-commission CFD trading, but spreads vary.
Can I Use TradingView With Either Broker?
Only Capital.com supports TradingView.
Which Broker Is Better for Beginners?
Trading 212 is easier for passive investors; Capital.com is better for structured learning.
Which Broker Is Safer?
Both are regulated and segregate client funds.